Aaron, your 30 incher is puny:

http://gizmodo.com/5056549/i-played-por ... -you-didnt



or if racing is more your thing...

Want.

Other than 7kW

Rofl nice! I'm pretty happy with my 110' HD projection screen

Tempted to check out css on it, would have to drag some cables into another room and would need to get an new cable to get my headphones across too lol. Not too sure how I would get the mouse and keyboard too tbh, would cost a lot to get all these extension cables

Mostly watch shows and movies on it, and of course xbox 360 games. So weird when I goto friends houses and play games on their 32 inch tv's, you just can't go back

OLED version would save power no?

110'? HOLY CRAP, that's like 1320 inches! xP

OLED would save power, I think

Good grief that screen is INSANE! O_O

OMFG How lush is that?! The midget car driver made me laugh

Now if that was a real car, he'd be hanging off the steering wheel.

Yea I've already got one of those in my bedroom......

Sure you have, Goz, sure it isn't 150mm?

................. is that real? If so.. wow... new console, puts you into the game and you must do it all yourself....

The screen is real. The guy is just being silly to give you a size comparison.

Oh snap, that's the one!

That's a nice screen... but mine already sucks 100W constant, which is enough.

Interestingly that means your screen is 2-3x more efficient than this one, seeing as it has 25x the screen size and 70x the power usage.

thats prob less to do with size and more to do with the masiase back lamps that are needed to light the screen apsolutly evenly and probablt v brightly lol

Yeah, but theoretically you need the same amount of lamps/area for any size.

yeah but in a aray that big the thing will get vvvvv hot so will ether have a diff cooler runing lamps or cooling arays that dont regurlty apear in the average screen, though thinking bout smin we were covering just today , its siz will mean a much bigger distance the power has to travel witch will dramaticaly efect the efecency overaly neway lol, the control ciruits will prob b more power hungy but prob dosnt scale directly by size

Some more information about this;

http://gizmodo.com/5057047/incredible-s ... -plasma-tv

http://gizmodo.com/5056828/panasonics-1 ... -your-life

Also, the res is a paltry 3996x2160, which is an incredibly low pixel density. If you lined up 25 of Aaron's monitor to make a single super monitor, the resolution would be 12800x8000 (I think), which is many times greater.

I think running on that monitor at standard res may not be TOO much of an ask, maybe a top end rig could do it.

do not want

:O how can you say that?

I'm likely to accidentally break it.

True, and costing $100K+ is not a good thing to break.

i also have a habit of taking my TV over to my m8's house, and fitting a 42inch into a Nissan micra is hard enough.

Heh, these TVs are so big there is no existing crate big enough. And you can only fit 2 in a 747's cargo.